Resources

media type="file" key="Final Sterling 21st T + L.mp3" width="240" height="20"
 * [|Final Sterling 21st T + L.mp3]

Powerpoint for Friday February 26th, 2010 Praxis Proposal Presentation with Group 2 media type="custom" key="5461559" || media type="file" key="Education Video edited.wmv" width="300" height="300" || Allen, I.E., Seaman, J., and Garrett, R. (2007). Blending in: the extent and promise of blended education in the United States. Retrieved October 8, 2008 from http://sloanconsortium.org/publications/survey/pdf/Blending_In.pdf Becta. (2002). //What the research says about ICT and motivation.// Retrieved online January 31, 2010 from http://partners.becta.org.uk/upload-dir/downloads/page_documents/research/wtrs_motivation.pdf Biggs, J. (1999//)//. //Teaching for quality learning at university.// Buckingham, UK: SRHE and Open University Press. Biggs, J. (2003). //Aligning teaching and assessment to curriculum objectives//. Buckingham, UK: Learning and Teaching Support Network, Generic Centre. Chan, C.K.K. & van Aalst, J. (2004). Learning, assessment, and collaboration in computer-supported collaborative learning. In J. W. Strijbos, P. Kirschner, & R. Martens (Eds.), What we know about CSCL: and implementing it in higher education (pp. 87-112). Kluwer Academic Publishers. Clariana, R., & Wallace, P. (2002). Paper-based versus computer-based assessment: key factors associated with the test mode effect. //British Journal of Educational Technology, 33//(5), 593-602. Cox, M., & Marshall, G. (2007). Effects of ICT: Do we know what we should know? //Education and Information Technologies, 12//(2), 59-70. Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Dillenbourg, P., Eurelings, A., & Hakkarainen, K. (2001). //European perspectives on computer-supported collaborative learning//. Maastricht: University of Maastricht. Education Quality and Accountability Office. (2009). Assessments of Reading http://www.eqao.com. Fox, C. (2008). THE TIME IS NOW. //T H E Journal//, //35//(7), 10-11. Retrieved from Education Research Complete database. Harris, S., & Kington, A. (2002). //Innovative classroom practice using ICT in England: the second information technology in education study (SITES),// National Foundation for Educational Research. Kanuka, H. (2005). An exploration into facilitating higher levels of learning in a text-based Internet learning environment using diverse instructional strategies. //Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 10//(3). Koschmann, T. (1996). Paradigm shifts and instructional technology: An introduction. In T. Koschmann (Ed.), CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm (pp. 1-23). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Koschmann, T., Hall, R., & Miyake, N. (Eds.). (2002). //CSCL 2: Carrying forward the conversation//. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Leu, D. J., Jr., Kinzer, C. K., Coiro, J., & Cammack, D. (2004). Toward a theory of new literacies emerging from the Internet and other information and communication technologies. [Electronic version]. //Reading Online, 7//(5). Available: http://www.readingonline.org/newliteracies/lit_index.asp?HREF=/newliteracies/leu Mokhtari, K., Kymes, A., & Edwards, P. (2008). Assessing the new literacies of online reading comprehension: An informative interview with W. Ian O'Byrne, Lisa Zawilinski, J. Greg McVerry, and Donald J. Leu at the University of Connecticut. //Reading Teacher, 62//(4), 354-357. Retrieved from ERIC database. Ontario Ministry of Education and Training. (1998). Guide to the Provincial Report Card, Grades 1-8. Retrieved online January 30, 2010 from http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/document/forms/report/1998/repgde.pdf Reinking, D. (1998). Synthesizing technological transformations of literacy in a post-typographic world. In D. Reinking, M.C. McKenna, L.D. Labbo, & R.D. Kieffer (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformations in a post-typographic world (pp. xi-xxx). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Rolheiser, C., & Ross, J. (2008). //Student self-evaluation: What research says and what practice shows.// Retrieved May 30, 2008 from http://www.cdl.org/resource-library/articles/self_eval.php?type=subject&id=4 Russell, R. (1999). Experience based learning theories. The informal learning review. Retrieved online January 31, 2010 from http://www.informallearning.com/archive/1999-0304-a.htm Stahl, G. (2002). Contributions to a theoretical framework for CSCL {Electronic version}. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Computer support for collaborative learning: Foundations for a CSCL community (pp. 62-71). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Sterling, T. (2008). Quantitative study of computer-based literacy instruction and assessment. A comprehensive final paper submitted June 15, 2008 in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Education (Ed. D.), Walden University. Tucker, Bill. "Beyond the Bubble: Technology and the Future of Student Assessment." __Education Sector.__ 17 Feb. 2009. Tyler, R.W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Wang, S., Jiao, H., Young, M., Brooks, T., & Olson, J. (2008). Comparability of computer-based and paper-and-pencil testing in K-12 reading assessments: A meta-Analysis of testing mode effects. //Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68//, 5-24. ||
 * < Here is the Panasonic video that I've used to hook viewers to think about preparing today's learner for tomorrow's world
 * < Here is an image of [|Tania_Proposed_Research_Design.JPG] ||
 * < Here is the [|PPP Graphic OrganizerFeb26.doc] to accompany my presentation on February 26, 2010 ||
 * < Landauer, T., Lochbaum, K., & Dooley, S. (2009). A New Formative Assessment Technology for Reading and Writing. //Theory Into Practice//, //48//(1), 44-52. doi:10.1080/00405840802577593. [|Pearson WriteToLearn 2009.pdf]